1981 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 MCC Smart is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 45 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart.
Because 1981 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 MCC Smart. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 MCC Smart (145 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (64 Nm). This means 2003 MCC Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Daihatsu Taft | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | Daihatsu | MCC |
Model | Taft | Smart |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Size | 958 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 64 Nm | 145 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2510 mm |