1981 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2006 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2006 Volvo XC70 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,524 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volvo XC70 (208 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 658 kg more than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo XC70 (321 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (64 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo XC70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Daihatsu Taft | 2006 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Taft | XC70 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Engine Size | 958 cc | 2524 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 321 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2770 mm |