1981 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 54 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Because 1981 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford E-250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 324 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Daihatsu Taft. (64 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Daihatsu Taft | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Taft | E-250 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 958 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 64 Nm | 388 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3510 mm |