1981 Datsun 280 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Datsun 280 (180 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Datsun 280 weights approximately 132 kg more than 2000 Ford Artic. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Datsun 280 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
| Make | Datsun | Ford |
| Model | 280 | Artic |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2753 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 128 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5240 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3200 mm |
