1981 Datsun 280 vs. 2002 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Nissan Cima is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 4,498 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan Cima weights approximately 340 kg more than 1981 Datsun 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Datsun 280 has automatic transmission and 2002 Nissan Cima has manual transmission. 2002 Nissan Cima will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Datsun 280 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Datsun 280 | 2002 Nissan Cima | |
| Make | Datsun | Nissan |
| Model | 280 | Cima |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2753 cc | 4498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1500 mm |
