1981 Datsun 280 vs. 2003 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2003 Ford Econoline is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Econoline (197 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1981 Datsun 280. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Econoline should accelerate faster than 1981 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford Econoline weights approximately 895 kg more than 1981 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Datsun 280 | 2003 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Datsun | Ford |
| Model | 280 | Econoline |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2753 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 197 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 2325 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3510 mm |
