1981 Datsun 280 vs. 2004 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2004 Ford Taurus is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Taurus (200 HP) has 20 more horse power than 1981 Datsun 280. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1981 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Taurus weights approximately 73 kg more than 1981 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Datsun 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Datsun 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Taurus, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Datsun 280 | 2004 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Datsun | Ford |
Model | 280 | Taurus |
Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2753 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 200 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 79 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1503 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2620 mm |