1981 Datsun 280 vs. 2010 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2010 Nissan Armada is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 5,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Armada (317 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1981 Datsun 280. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1981 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Armada weights approximately 1091 kg more than 1981 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Datsun 280 | 2010 Nissan Armada | |
| Make | Datsun | Nissan |
| Model | 280 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2753 cc | 5600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 180 HP | 317 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 2521 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5276 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2014 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3129 mm |
