1981 Datsun 280 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1981 Datsun 280. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1981 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 100 kg more than 1981 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Datsun 280 | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Datsun | Cadillac |
Model | 280 | ATS |
Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2753 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 268 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2776 mm |