1981 Datsun 280 vs. 2013 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2013 Nissan Juke is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 2,753 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Nissan Juke (185 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1981 Datsun 280. (180 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1981 Datsun 280. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Nissan Juke weights approximately 11 kg more than 1981 Datsun 280. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Datsun 280. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Datsun 280 | 2013 Nissan Juke | |
Make | Datsun | Nissan |
Model | 280 | Juke |
Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2753 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 185 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1441 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2530 mm |