1981 Dodge Omni vs. 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 2,237 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 535 kg more than 1981 Dodge Omni.
Because 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Dodge Omni | 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
| Make | Dodge | Toyota |
| Model | Omni | Hi-Ace |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1716 cc | 2237 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 16 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 70 L |
