1981 Dodge Omni vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Dodge Omni. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Dodge Omni would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER weights approximately 857 kg more than 1981 Dodge Omni.
Because 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Dodge Omni, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Dodge Omni | 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER | |
Make | Dodge | Dodge |
Model | Omni | CHALLENGER |
Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1716 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 367 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5023 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1923 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1449 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2946 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 49 L | 72 L |