1981 Fiat Argenta vs. 2002 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2002 Volvo XC90 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo XC90 (197 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Argenta. (136 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2002 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Argenta | 2002 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Argenta | XC90 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 93.2 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 72 L |