1981 Fiat Argenta vs. 2010 Chevrolet Epica
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Epica is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Argenta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Argenta would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Argenta. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Epica should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Argenta.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Epica (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Argenta. (136 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Argenta.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Argenta | 2010 Chevrolet Epica | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Argenta | Epica |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 92 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4440 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 65 L |