1981 Fiat Campagnola vs. 2006 Toyota MR2
To start off, 2006 Toyota MR2 is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Campagnola. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Campagnola would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Fiat Campagnola is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Toyota MR2 (140 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Campagnola. (79 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Toyota MR2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Campagnola.
Because 1981 Fiat Campagnola is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota MR2. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Campagnola will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Toyota MR2 (231 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Campagnola. (151 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2006 Toyota MR2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Campagnola.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Campagnola | 2006 Toyota MR2 | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Campagnola | MR2 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 151 Nm | 231 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 60 L |