1981 Fiat Panda vs. 2000 Matra-Simca M72
To start off, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Panda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Panda would be higher. In terms of performance, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 (50 HP) has 16 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Panda. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Matra-Simca M72 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Panda.
Because 2000 Matra-Simca M72 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Matra-Simca M72. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Panda | 2000 Matra-Simca M72 | |
Make | Fiat | Matra-Simca |
Model | Panda | M72 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 50 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |