1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1981 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (123 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1952 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1952 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 175 kg more than 1952 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Fiat | Saab |
Model | Ritmo | 92 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |