1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (123 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 190 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1981 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | Ritmo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |