1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1967 Wartburg 312
To start off, 1981 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Wartburg 312. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Wartburg 312 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (81 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1967 Wartburg 312. (45 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1967 Wartburg 312. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 6 kg more than 1967 Wartburg 312. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Wartburg 312. (98 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1981 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Wartburg 312.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 1967 Wartburg 312 | |
Make | Fiat | Wartburg |
Model | Ritmo | 312 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 45 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 914 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 43 L |