1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1981 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (118 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 40 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda RX-2 (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda RX-2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Fiat Ritmo | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
| Make | Fiat | Mazda |
| Model | Ritmo | RX-2 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2290 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 157 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2480 mm |
