1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1990 Mercury Sable
To start off, 1990 Mercury Sable is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,511 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Mercury Sable weights approximately 540 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Fiat Ritmo | 1990 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercury |
| Model | Ritmo | Sable |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1990 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1049 cc | 2511 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 1400 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |
