1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1996 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 1996 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,896 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (81 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. (63 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1996 Seat Inca Kombi. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 185 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 127 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Fiat Ritmo | 1996 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Fiat | Seat |
| Model | Ritmo | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 81 HP | 63 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1105 kg |
