1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 1998 Acura EL
To start off, 1998 Acura EL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Acura EL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Acura EL (127 HP) has 46 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Acura EL should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Acura EL weights approximately 159 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Acura EL (145 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1998 Acura EL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 1998 Acura EL | |
Make | Fiat | Acura |
Model | Ritmo | EL |
Year Released | 1981 | 1998 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 127 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1079 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4478 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1704 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2619 mm |