1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2000 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2000 Lancia Zeta is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Lancia Zeta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Zeta (145 HP) has 64 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 730 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Zeta (235 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 2000 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Fiat | Lancia |
Model | Ritmo | Zeta |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |