1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2003 Kia Visto
To start off, 2003 Kia Visto is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,049 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2003 Kia Visto. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2003 Kia Visto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 60 kg more than 2003 Kia Visto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Kia Visto. (73 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1981 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Kia Visto.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 2003 Kia Visto | |
Make | Fiat | Kia |
Model | Ritmo | Visto |
Year Released | 1981 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1049 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 73 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 860 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2390 mm |