1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Cadillac SRX
To start off, 2010 Cadillac SRX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac SRX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac SRX (265 HP) has 184 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac SRX should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac SRX weights approximately 996 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac SRX (302 Nm @ 5100 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac SRX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Cadillac SRX | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Ritmo | SRX |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 265 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 302 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1916 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4834 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1669 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 79 L |