1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Impala (211 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 693 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Impala (293 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Chevrolet Impala | |
Make | Fiat | Chevrolet |
Model | Ritmo | Impala |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 211 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 293 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1491 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 64 L |