1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (123 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (172 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | E-350 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 57 L |