1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Fiat Ritmo (123 HP) has 56 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Ritmo | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1981 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1993 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 123 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |