1981 Fiat Ritmo vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP) has 233 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 992 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Fiat Ritmo | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Fiat | Cadillac |
Model | Ritmo | XTS |
Year Released | 1981 | 2013 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 314 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2831 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 76 L |