1981 Fiat Vivace vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Vivace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Vivace would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Fiat Vivace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Vivace. (62 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Vivace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Fiat Vivace weights approximately 370 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1981 Fiat Vivace, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Fiat Vivace | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Fiat | Westfield |
| Model | Vivace | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 810 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3750 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 2320 mm |
