1981 Ford Capri vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Ford Capri is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Capri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Ford Capri (160 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Ford Capri should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Capri weights approximately 20 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Capri (220 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1981 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Capri | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Ford | Triumph |
Model | Capri | 2000 |
Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2790 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 64 L |