1981 Ford Capri vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2002 MCC Crossblade is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Capri would be higher. At 1,593 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Ford Capri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 3 more horse power than 1981 Ford Capri. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Capri. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Capri weights approximately 270 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Capri (115 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1981 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Capri | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Capri | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2700 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 1810 mm |