1981 Ford Capri vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Capri. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Capri would be higher. At 2,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Capri is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Ford Capri (160 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Ford Capri should accelerate faster than 2005 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Capri weights approximately 446 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Capri (220 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1981 Ford Capri will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Capri | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
Make | Ford | MCC |
Model | Capri | Crossblade |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2790 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 160 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 220 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 744 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 2630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 1810 mm |