1981 Ford Cougar vs. 2002 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2002 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Cougar would be higher. At 4,186 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 362 kg more than 1981 Ford Cougar.
Because 2002 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Cougar | 2002 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Cougar | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1981 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4186 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 177 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1842 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2630 mm |