1981 Ford Cougar vs. 2005 Suzuki X2
To start off, 2005 Suzuki X2 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Cougar would be higher.
Because 2005 Suzuki X2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Ford Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki X2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Cougar | 2005 Suzuki X2 | |
Make | Ford | Suzuki |
Model | Cougar | X2 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2650 mm |