1981 Ford Falcon vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 1997 Acura TL is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Acura TL (176 HP) has 67 more horse power than 1981 Ford Falcon. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Falcon.
Because 1981 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Falcon | 1997 Acura TL | |
| Make | Ford | Acura |
| Model | Falcon | TL |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 176 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4864 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1786 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1405 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2840 mm |
