1981 Ford Falcon vs. 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo
To start off, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1981 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Falcon | 2000 Pininfarina Metrocubo | |
| Make | Ford | Pininfarina |
| Model | Falcon | Metrocubo |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3273 cc | 505 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 109 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
