1981 Ford Falcon vs. 2009 Ford E-350
To start off, 2009 Ford E-350 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1981 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Falcon weights approximately 404 kg more than 2009 Ford E-350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-350 (475 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Falcon | 2009 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Falcon | E-350 |
Year Released | 1981 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 228 Nm | 475 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 15 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3510 mm |