1981 Ford Falcon vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 3,273 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 131 more horse power than 1981 Ford Falcon. (109 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Ford Falcon. (228 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Falcon | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Ford | Holden |
Model | Falcon | Commodore |
Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3273 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 109 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |