1981 Ford Granada vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1981 Ford Granada is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1981 Ford Granada. (68 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Granada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Granada weights approximately 200 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Ford Granada. (148 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Ford Granada.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Granada | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Granada | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 148 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 76 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2700 mm |
