1981 Ford Granada vs. 2004 Volkswagen Concept C
To start off, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Granada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Granada would be higher. At 2,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Granada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 148 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Because 1981 Ford Granada is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Granada. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volkswagen Concept C, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Granada (216 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Volkswagen Concept C. (200 Nm). This means 1981 Ford Granada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Volkswagen Concept C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Granada | 2004 Volkswagen Concept C | |
| Make | Ford | Volkswagen |
| Model | Granada | Concept C |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2790 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 216 Nm | 200 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 82.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.5 mm | 92.8 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
