1981 Ford Monarch vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 184 kg more than 1981 Ford Monarch.
Because 1981 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Monarch | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Ford | Oldsmobile |
Model | Monarch | Aurora |
Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4122 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2900 mm |