1981 Ford Monarch vs. 2000 Proton 300
To start off, 2000 Proton 300 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Monarch weights approximately 425 kg more than 2000 Proton 300.
Because 1981 Ford Monarch is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Monarch. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Proton 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1981 Ford Monarch has automatic transmission and 2000 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 2000 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1981 Ford Monarch will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Monarch | 2000 Proton 300 | |
| Make | Ford | Proton |
| Model | Monarch | 300 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4122 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 75 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2450 mm |
