1981 Ford Monarch vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 982 kg more than 1981 Ford Monarch.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Ford Monarch. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Monarch | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Ford | Land Rover |
| Model | Monarch | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4122 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2442 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2890 mm |
