1981 Ford Monarch vs. 2012 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC90 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Monarch. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Monarch would be higher. At 4,122 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Ford Monarch is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 695 kg more than 1981 Ford Monarch.
Because 2012 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Ford Monarch. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Monarch | 2012 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Monarch | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1981 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4122 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 2155 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4808 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1897 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2860 mm |
