1981 Ford Mustang vs. 1980 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1981 Ford Mustang is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1981 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Mustang weights approximately 134 kg more than 1980 Matra-Simca Murena.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1981 Ford Mustang | 1980 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Ford | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Mustang | Murena |
| Year Released | 1981 | 1980 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2294 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 96.1 mm | 91.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 81.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1185 kg | 1051 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4080 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2440 mm |
