1981 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Mini MK VI

To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Ford Mustang (173 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Mustang weights approximately 735 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mini MK VI, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Mustang (332 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1981 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.

Compare all specifications: