1981 Ford Mustang vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 22 more horse power than 1981 Ford Mustang. (173 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1981 Ford Mustang.
Because 1981 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Mustang (332 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1981 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
1981 Ford Mustang | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Mustang | FTO |
Year Released | 1981 | 1996 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 173 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 332 Nm | 202 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1300 mm |