1981 Ford Mustang vs. 1998 Rover 420

To start off, 1998 Rover 420 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1981 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Ford Mustang (173 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1998 Rover 420. (87 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1981 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 420. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Ford Mustang weights approximately 166 kg more than 1998 Rover 420. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1981 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 420, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Ford Mustang (332 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 420. (184 Nm). This means 1981 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 420.

Compare all specifications: